Skip to main content
        

Web & Telco 2.0

Go Search

IBIL (M) Sdn Bhd > Web & Telco 2.0
An IBIL Technology Blog. Compilation of news related to Technology.
A Ray Ozzie Memo: Dawn of a New Day

Stumbled on this memo while browsing the web two nights ago, everyone knows Bill… Bill Gates. Some, who’re deep into Technology Thought-Gurus, would know Ray Ozzie. I found this memo he wrote before leaving Microsoft to be so, wow! This is an example of a person, whose knowledge is not about what is, how and today… his wisdom leads and fuels the future. Ladies and gentleman, Ray Ozzie…

 

 

Ray Ozzie      Ray Ozzie

Source: http://ozzie.net/docs/dawn-of-a-new-day/

Dawn of a New Day

To:           Executive Staff and direct reports

Date:         October 28, 2010

From:         Ray Ozzie

Subject:      Dawn of a New Day

 

Five years ago, having only recently arrived at the company, I wrote The Internet Services Disruption in order to kick off a major change management process across the company.  In the opening section of that memo, I noted that about every five years our industry experiences what appears to be an inflection point that results in great turbulence and change.

 

In the wake of that memo, the last five years has been a time of great transformation for Microsoft.  At this point we’re truly all in with regard to services.  I’m incredibly proud of the people and the work that has been done across the company, and of the way that we’ve turned this services transformation into opportunities that will pay off for years to come.

 

In the realm of the service-centric ‘seamless OS’ we’re well on the path to having Windows Live serve as an optional yet natural services complement to the Windows and Office software.  In the realm of ‘seamless productivity’, Office 365 and our 2010 Office, SharePoint and Live deliverables have shifted Office from being PC-centric toward now also robustly spanning the web and mobile.  In ‘seamless entertainment’, Xbox Live has transformed Xbox into a real-time, social, media-rich TV experience.

 

And in the realm of what I referred to as our ‘services platform’, I couldn’t be more proud of what’s emerged as Windows Azure & SQL Azure.  Inspired by little more than a memo, a few decks and discussions, intrapreneurial leaders stepped up to build and deliver an innovative service that, while still nascent, will over time prove to be transformational for the company and the industry.

 

Our products are now more relevant than ever.  Bing has blossomed and its advertising, social, metadata & real-time analytics capabilities are growing to power every one of our myriad services offerings.  Over the years the Windows client expanded its relevance even with the rise of low-cost netbooks.  Office expanded its relevance even with a shift toward open data formats & web-based productivity.  Our server assets have had greater relevance even with a marked shift toward virtualization & cloud computing.

 

Quite important to me, I’m also quite proud of the degree to which we’ve continued to grow and mature in the area of responsible competition, and the breadth and depth of our cultural shift toward genuine openness, interoperability and privacy which are now such key cornerstones of everything we do.

 

Yet, for all our great progress, some of the opportunities I laid out in my memo five years ago remain elusive and are yet to be realized.

 

Certain of our competitors’ products and their rapid advancement & refinement of new usage scenarios have been quite noteworthy.  Our early and clear vision notwithstanding, their execution has surpassed our own in mobile experiences, in the seamless fusion of hardware & software & services, and in social networking & myriad new forms of internet-centric social interaction.

 

We’ve seen agile innovation playing out before a backdrop in which many dramatic changes have occurred across all aspects of our industry’s core infrastructure.  These myriad evolutions of our infrastructure have been predicted for years, but in the past five years so much has happened that we’ve grown already to take many of these changes for granted:  Ubiquitous internet access over wired, WiFi and 3G/4G networks; many now even take for granted that LTE and ‘whitespace’ will be broadly delivered.  We’ve seen our boxy devices based on ‘system boards’ morph into sleek elegantly-designed devices based on transformational ‘systems on a chip’.  We’ve seen bulky CRT monitors replaced by impossibly thin touch screens.  We’ve seen business processes and entire organizations transformed by the zero-friction nature of the internet; the walls between producer and consumer having now vanished.  Substantial business ecosystems have collapsed as many classic aggregation & distribution mechanisms no longer make sense.

 

Organizations worldwide, in every industry, are now stepping back and re-thinking the basics; questioning their most fundamental structural tenets.  Doing so is necessary for their long-term growth and survival.  And our own industry is no exception, where we must question our most fundamental assumptions about infrastructure & apps.

 

The past five years have been breathtaking.  But the next five years will bring about yet another inflection point – a transformation that will once again yield unprecedented opportunities for our company and our industry catalyzed by the huge & inevitable shift in apps & infrastructure that’s truly now just begun.

 

Imagining A “Post-PC” World

 

One particular day next month, November 20th 2010, represents a significant milestone.  Those of us in the PC industry who placed an early bet on a then-nascent PC graphical UI will toast that day as being the 25th anniversary of the launch of Windows 1.0.

 

Our journey began in support of audacious concepts that were originally just imagined and dreamed:  A computer that’s ‘personal’. Or, a PC on every desktop and in every home, running Microsoft software.

 

Windows may not have been the first graphical UI on a personal computer, but over time the product unquestionably democratized computing & communications for more than a billion people worldwide.  Windows and Office truly grew to define the PC; establishing the core concepts and usage scenarios that for so many of us, over time, have become etched in stone.

 

For the most part, we’ve grown to perceive of ‘computing’ as being equated with specific familiar ‘artifacts’ such as the ‘computer’, the ‘program’ that’s installed on a computer, and the ‘files’ that are stored on that computer’s ‘desktop’.  For the majority of users, the PC is largely indistinguishable even from the ‘browser’ or ‘internet’.

 

As such, it’s difficult for many of us to even imagine that this could ever change.

 

But as the PC client and PC-based server have grown from their simple roots over the past 25 years, the PC-centric / server-centric model has accreted simply immense complexity.  This is a direct by-product of the PC’s success: how broad and diverse the PC’s ecosystem has become; how complex it’s become to manage the acquisition & lifecycle of our hardware, software, and data artifacts.  It’s undeniable that some form of this complexity is readily apparent to most all our customers:  your neighbors; any small business owner; the ‘tech’ head of household; enterprise IT.

 

Success begets product requirements.  And even when superhuman engineering and design talent is applied, there are limits to how much you can apply beautiful veneers before inherent complexity is destined to bleed through.

 

Complexity kills. Complexity sucks the life out of users, developers and IT.  Complexity makes products difficult to plan, build, test and use.  Complexity introduces security challenges.  Complexity causes administrator frustration.

 

And as time goes on and as software products mature – even with the best of intent – complexity is inescapable.

 

Indeed, many have pointed out that there’s a flip side to complexity:  in our industry, complexity of a successful product also tends to provide some assurance of its longevity.  Complex interdependencies and any product’s inherent ‘quirks’ will virtually guarantee that broadly adopted systems won’t simply vanish overnight.  And so long as a system is well-supported and continues to provide unique and material value to a customer, even many of the most complex and broadly maligned assets will hold their ground.  And why not?  They’re valuable.  They work.

 

But so long as customer or competitive requirements drive teams to build layers of new function on top of a complex core, ultimately a limit will be reached.  Fragility can grow to constrain agility.  Some deep architectural strengths can become irrelevant – or worse, can become hindrances.

 

Our PC software has driven the creation of an amazing ecosystem, and is incredibly valuable to a world of customers and partners.  And the PC and its ecosystem is going to keep growing, and growing, for a long time to come.  But today, as I wrote five years ago, ”Just as in the past, we must reflect upon what’s going on around us, and reflect upon our strengths, weaknesses and industry leadership responsibilities, and respond.  As much as ever, it’s clear that if we fail to do so, our business as we know it is at risk.”

 

And so at this juncture, given all that has transpired in computing and communications, it’s important that all of us do precisely what our competitors and customers will ultimately do: close our eyes and form a realistic picture of what a post-PC world might actually look like, if it were to ever truly occur.  How would customers accomplish the kinds of things they do today?  In what ways would it be better?  In what ways would it be worse, or just different?

 

Those who can envision a plausible future that’s brighter than today will earn the opportunity to lead.

 

In our industry, if you can imagine something, you can build it.  We at Microsoft know from our common past – even the past five years – that if we know what needs to be done, and if we act decisively, any challenge can be transformed into a significant opportunity.  And so, the first step for each of us is to imagine fearlessly; to dream.

 

Continuous Services | Connected Devices

 

What’s happened in every aspect of computing & communications over the course of the past five years has given us much to dream about.  Certainly the ‘net-connected PC, and PC-based servers, have driven the creation of an incredible industry and have laid the groundwork for mass-market understanding of so much of what’s possible with ‘computers’.  But slowly but surely, our lives, businesses and society are in the process of a wholesale reconfiguration in the way we perceive and apply technology.

 

As we’ve begun to embrace today’s incredibly powerful app-capable phones and pads into our daily lives, and as we’ve embraced myriad innovative services & websites, the early adopters among us have decidedly begun to move away from mentally associating our computing activities with the hardware/software artifacts of our past such as PC’s, CD-installed programs, desktops, folders & files.

 

Instead, to cope with the inherent complexity of a world of devices, a world of websites, and a world of apps & personal data that is spread across myriad devices & websites, a simple conceptual model is taking shape that brings it all together.  We’re moving toward a world of 1) cloud-based continuous services that connect us all and do our bidding, and 2) appliance-like connected devices enabling us to interact with those cloud-based services.

 

Continuous services are websites and cloud-based agents that we can rely on for more and more of what we do.  On the back end, they possess attributes enabled by our newfound world of cloud computing: They’re always-available and are capable of unbounded scale.  They’re constantly assimilating & analyzing data from both our real and online worlds.  They’re constantly being refined & improved based on what works, and what doesn’t.  By bringing us all together in new ways, they constantly reshape the social fabric underlying our society, organizations and lives.  From news & entertainment, to transportation, to commerce, to customer service, we and our businesses and governments are being transformed by this new world of services that we rely on to operate flawlessly, 7×24, behind the scenes.

 

Our personal and corporate data now sits within these services – and as a result we’re more and more concerned with issues of trust & privacy.  We most commonly engage and interact with these internet-based sites & services through the browser.  But increasingly, we also interact with these continuous services through apps that are loaded onto a broad variety of service-connected devices – on our desks, or in our pockets & pocketbooks.

 

Connected devices beyond the PC will increasingly come in a breathtaking number of shapes and sizes, tuned for a broad variety of communications, creation & consumption tasks.  Each individual will interact with a fairly good number of these connected devices on a daily basis – their phone / internet companion; their car; a shared public display in the conference room, living room, or hallway wall.  Indeed some of these connected devices may even grow to bear a resemblance to today’s desktop PC or clamshell laptop.  But there’s one key difference in tomorrow’s devices: they’re relatively simple and fundamentally appliance-like by design, from birth.  They’re instantly usable, interchangeable, and trivially replaceable without loss.  But being appliance-like doesn’t mean that they’re not also quite capable in terms of storage; rather, it just means that storage has shifted to being more cloud-centric than device-centric.  A world of content – both personal and published – is streamed, cached or synchronized with a world of cloud-based continuous services.

 

Moving forward, these ‘connected devices’ will also frequently take the form of embedded devices of varying purpose including telemetry & control.  Our world increasingly will be filled with these devices – from the remotely diagnosed elevator, to the sensors on our highways and throughout our environment.  These embedded devices will share a key attribute with non-embedded UI-centric devices:  they’re appliance-like, easily configured, interchangeable and replaceable without loss.

 

At first blush, this world of continuous services and connected devices doesn’t seem very different than today.  But those who build, deploy and manage today’s websites understand viscerally that fielding a truly continuous service is incredibly difficult and is only achieved by the most sophisticated high-scale consumer websites.  And those who build and deploy application fabrics targeting connected devices understand how challenging it can be to simply & reliably just ‘sync’ or ‘stream’.  To achieve these seemingly simple objectives will require dramatic innovation in human interface, hardware, software and services.

 

How It Might Happen

 

From the perspective of living so deeply within the world of the device-centric software & hardware that we’ve collectively created over the past 25 years, it’s understandably difficult to imagine how a dramatic, wholesale shift toward this new continuous services + connected devices model would ever plausibly gain traction relative to what’s so broadly in use today.  But in the technology world, these industry-scoped transformations have indeed happened before.  Complexity accrues; dramatically new and improved capabilities arise.

 

Many years ago when the PC first emerged as an alternative to the mini and mainframe, the key facets of simplicity and broad approachability were key to its amazing success.  If there’s to be a next wave of industry reconfiguration – toward a world of internet-connected continuous services and appliance-like connected devices – it would likely arise again from those very same facets.

 

It may take quite a while to happen, but I believe that in some form or another, without doubt, it will.

 

For each of us who can clearly envision the end-game, the opportunity is to recognize both the inevitability and value inherent in the big shift ahead, and to do what it takes to lead our customers into this new world.

 

In the short term, this means imagining the ‘killer apps & services’ and ‘killer devices’ that match up to a broad range of customer needs as they’ll evolve in this new era.  Whether in the realm of communications, productivity, entertainment or business, tomorrow’s experiences & solutions are likely to differ significantly even from today’s most successful apps.  Tomorrow’s experiences will be inherently transmedia & trans-device.  They’ll be centered on your own social & organizational networks.  For both individuals and businesses, new consumption & interaction models will change the game.  It’s inevitable.

 

To deliver what seems to be required – e.g. an amazing level of coherence across apps, services and devices – will require innovation in user experience, interaction model, authentication model, user data & privacy model, policy & management model, programming & application model, and so on.  These platform innovations will happen in small, progressive steps, providing significant opportunity to lead.  In adapting our strategies, tactics, plans & processes to deliver what’s required by this new world, the opportunity is simply huge.

 

The one irrefutable truth is that in any large organization, any transformation that is to ‘stick’ must emerge from within.  Those on the outside can strongly influence, particularly with their wallets.  Those above are responsible for developing and articulating a compelling vision, eliminating obstacles, prioritizing resources, and generally setting the stage with a principled approach.

 

But the power and responsibility to truly effect transformation exists in no small part at the edge.  Within those who, led or inspired, feel personally and collectively motivated to make; to act; to do.

 

In taking the time to read this, most likely it’s you.

 

Realizing a Dream

 

In 1939, in New York City, there was an amazing World’s Fair.  It was called ‘the greatest show of all time’.

 

In that year Americans were exhausted, having lived through a decade of depression.  Unemployment still hovered above 17%.  In Europe, the next world war was brewing.  It was an undeniably dark juncture for us all.

 

And yet, this 1939 World’s Fair opened in a way that evoked broad and acute hope: the promise of a glorious future.  There were pavilions from industry & countries all across the world showing vision; showing progress:  The Futurama; The World of Tomorrow.  Icons conjuring up images of the future:  The Trylon; The Perisphere.

 

The fair’s theme:  Dawn of a New Day.

 

Surrounding the event, stories were written and vividly told to help everyone envision and dream of a future of modern conveniences; superhighways & spacious suburbs; technological wonders to alleviate hardship and improve everyday life.

 

The fair’s exhibits and stories laid a broad-based imprint across society of what needed to be done.  To plausibly leap from such a dark time to such a potentially wonderful future meant having an attitude, individually and collectively, that we could achieve whatever we set our minds to.  That anything was possible.

 

In the following years – fueled both by what was necessary for survival and by our hope for the future – manufacturing jumped 50%.  Technological breakthroughs abounded.  What had been so hopefully and optimistically imagined by many, was achieved by all.

 

And, as their children, now we’re living their dreams.

 

Today, in my own dreams, I see a great, expansive future for our industry and for our company – a future of amazing, pervasive cloud-centric experiences delivered through a world of innovative devices that surround us.

 

Without a doubt, as in 1939 there are conditions in our society today that breed uncertainty: jobs, housing, health, education, security, the environment.  And yes, there are also challenging conditions for our company: it’s a tough, fast-moving, and highly competitive environment.

 

And yet, even in the presence of so much uncertainty, I feel an acute sense of hope and optimism.

 

When I look forward, I can’t help but see the potential for a much brighter future:  Even beyond the first billion, so many more people using technology to improve their lives, businesses and societies, in so many ways.  New apps, services & scenarios in communications, collaboration & productivity, commerce, education, health care, emergency management, human services, transportation, the environment, security – the list goes on, and on, and on.

 

We’ve got so far to go before we even scratch the surface of what’s now possible.  All these new services will be cloud-centric ‘continuous services’ built in a way that we can all rely upon.  As such, cloud computing will become pervasive for developers and IT – a shift that’ll catalyze the transformation of infrastructure, systems & business processes across all major organizations worldwide.  And all these new services will work hand-in-hand with an unimaginably fascinating world of devices-to-come.  Today’s PC’s, phones & pads are just the very beginning; we’ll see decades to come of incredible innovation from which will emerge all sorts of ‘connected companions’ that we’ll wear, we’ll carry, we’ll use on our desks & walls and the environment all around us.  Service-connected devices going far beyond just the ‘screen, keyboard and mouse’:  humanly-natural ‘conscious’ devices that’ll see, recognize, hear & listen to you and what’s around you, that’ll feel your touch and gestures and movement, that’ll detect your proximity to others; that’ll sense your location, direction, altitude, temperature, heartbeat & health.

 

Let there be no doubt that the big shifts occurring over the next five years ensure that this will absolutely be a time of great opportunity for those who put past technologies & successes into perspective, and envision all the transformational value that can be offered moving forward to individuals, businesses, governments and society.  It’s the dawn of a new day – the sun having now arisen on a world of continuous services and connected devices.

 

And so, as Microsoft has done so successfully over the course of the company’s history, let’s mark this five-year milestone by once again fearlessly embracing that which is technologically inevitable – clearing a path to the extraordinary opportunity that lies ahead for us, for the industry, and for our customers.

 

Ray

Virtual router is really fast
South Korean researchers build a record-breaking device

A BUNCH OF BOFFINS have cannibalised desktop computers to build a networking router that is so fast it should interest those people at Guinness.

The researchers, mostly from South Korea's Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, built the router from components found in high end computers. Impressively for such a Heath Robinson sounding device, it can transmit data at almost 40Gbps.

The router, called Packetshader, uses a computer's GPU to help it shift data and this is what makes it so fast. Typically a network card can handle 10Gbps and this was the target that the researchers initially aimed for. However, it soon became clear that they could stretch it further.

"We started with the humble goal of being the first to get a PC router to 10 [gigabytes per second], but we pushed it to 40," said Sue Moon, leader of the research lab in an article at Technology Review.

This speed increase opens up possibilities for router manufacturers, and could mean that your average GPU chip, by say Nividia, could suffice where previously only custom kit could be used, according to the report.

"We can expect killer apps out of this," added KyoungSoo Park, who was also involved. "You can build an interesting packet- or network-management system on top of a PC-based software router that can't be implemented with a hardware router. Ultimately, you can experiment with new protocols that are not used in today's Internet." µ

The iPhone Killed the Open Web, Again

 

The iPhone Killed the Open Web, Again

 

The latest Big Idea from Wired editor man Chris "Atoms Are the New Bits and Tails Are Long" Anderson: "The web is dead." Why? Apps, Facebook, iPhones.

 

Chris Anderson's new Big Idea—that the open web is giving way to a mere transport system for closed or semiclosed platforms like Facebook or iPhone apps from the App Store—is not very new. In its current iPhone-y, app-y incarnation, it's at least a couple of years old. Wired even participates in the very phenomenon it bemoans, with its very fancy iPad app. (Because it has to: "The assumption had been that once the market matured, big companies would be able to reverse the hollowing-out trend of analog dollars turning into digital pennies. Sadly that hasn't been the case for most on the Web, and by the looks of it there's no light at the end of that tunnel.") And the general idea itself goes back even further—Wired proclaimed the browser was dead in 1997, as he points out.

It's true that the open, free-for-all web is besieged, but in a lot of ways Anderson doesn't mention, like the potential neutering of net neutrality principles or the ongoing bandwidth crimp that could hamper innovative-but-data-intensive services—and, in turn, push users toward the kind of boxed services (cable VOD or ISP preferred content) that has Anderson so nerve-wracked. Like Comcast giving preferred access to NBC's content by not counting it toward your monthly data allowance (since Comcast owns half of NBC now), or Verizon speeding up YouTube over Vimeo. You can look at it as a hardware problem vs. a software problem—and if the hardware is screwed, so is the software.

So, there are reasons to be nervous about the future of the web—but I'm not sure the excellent NPR app is one of them. Right now, apps do things the open web can't, particularly on mobile devices. Once they're on par—or rather, if they never are—then we can decide just how afraid of apps we need to be. (My favorite iPhone app is still Safari. Hint to media companies: Build better websites!) Oh, while we're talking about apps, Chris, since I subscribe to the dead-tree edition of Wired, can we work out a way for me to see the very nice videos from the iPad app without paying full price, twice?

The iPhone Killed the Open Web, Again

 

Update: Mr. Beschizza of BoingBoing points out that this is what the above graph would look like if it depicted total web traffic and its growth over the last decade, not simply proportions of total traffic—which implies that traffic has been the same. It hasn't. It's kaboomed.

The Kids Are Texting a Frightening Amount

The Kids Are Texting a Frightening Amount

It goes without saying that texting is startlingly popular—but what does popular even mean? Mashable has an infographic illustrating who's texting the most (hint: teen girls), where, and how far we've come since the advent of the SMS.

How Data Travels From a Wireless Device

How Data Travels From a Wireless DeviceHow

How does that picture you just sent your buddy get from your phone to his computer, exactly? Surprisingly enough, not through pixie dust and unicorn dreams! Here's how it really works.

This infographic from Time Warner Cable shows just how involved the process is, and acts as a good reminder that sending something "wirelessly" actually often involves, well, a whole bunch of wires.

Internet will soon be running on IPv4 address fumes

Internet will soon be running on IPv4 address fumes

Earlier today, someone I follow on Twitter retweeted a message from Alyssa Milano. This is what the former TV star had to say:

Less Than 1 Year Until The Internet Runs Out of Addresses

This wasn't the first time someone said that we were going to run out of IPv4 addresses soon. Or, to stick to the TV theme: all of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again

It all started with the Internet Engineering Task Force in the early 1990s. Reportedly, it was determined that we'd run out of addresses in 2005. Two years before that apocalyptic year, on September 4, 2003, I was sitting in the Grand Ballroom of the Krasnapolsky Hotel in the center of Amsterdam for the last day of sessions of the RIPE-46 meeting. (The RIPE NCC is the organization that gives out IP addresses in Europe and some other regions.) Geoff Huston gave a presentation titled "IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited" where he showed the trends in IP address deployment, and used a simple model to extrapolate these trends to predict the moment the last IP address would be used up. According to the then available data and the model, that last IPv4 address would be put into actual use somewhere between 2038 and 2045—no, that's not military time for later tonight, but sometime between Y2K38 and 100 years after the end of World War II.

geoffhustonripe46.jpg

So we went from "two years left" to "35 years left" in less than an afternoon. (Of course by 2003 everyone had realized we wouldn't run out of addresses in 2005 and there was widespread skepticism about Huston's results, but still.)

Two years later, in 2005, Geoff Huston was back in Amsterdam for the RIPE-51 meeting with a new presentation, also titled "IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited." In the intervening two years, he had adjusted his model and chose the moment the first of the five Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) runs out of addresses as the moment of truth, rather than the moment the last ISP puts the last address into actual use. This, combined with the sharp increase in IPv4 address use in 2004 and 2005, resulted in two new dates: the IANA pool would run out on August 5, 2012 and the first RIR would run out of addresses on May 2, 2014. Of course that didn't quite unring the bell from two years earlier—fool me once...

Since that time, Huston's automatically generated predictions have climbed up to (at least) 2016 and then gone back down again, with the current predictions estimating the day the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) gives out its last block of 16,777,216 addresses to one of the RIRs to be July 1, 2011, and the day the last IPv4 address is given out by an RIR as January 20, 2012.

It's this first projected date that is getting all the attention right now. There are 221 usable blocks of 16.8 million addresses ("/8s") in the IANA global pool. 205 have been given out to RIRs or large organizations such MIT, Apple, HP, and especially the US military. That leaves 16. The IANA and the RIRs have agreed that IANA can give out two /8s at a time, and that each of the RIRs gets one of the last five. So depending on how exactly they apply this rule, once the IANA pool reaches 6 or 7 /8s, those last blocks can evaporate overnight. Given that we've been using up about one /8 each month, a year until this happens seems a reasonable estimate. John Curran, president and CEO of ARIN, tells Ars that it could happen much faster, however.

"The rate of allocation from the IANA central pool has picked up; we've allocated 10 /8s since January 1, and that's a run rate nearly twice that of previous years," Curran told Ars. "If the rate of the last six months were to continue for the remainder of the year, we could actually be at 5 /8s by year-end."

That could happen, but allocation of /8s to the RIRs has happened in bursts in the past, so the increase in allocation rate earlier this year could also be completely meaningless. The interesting part is what comes after the IANA global pool has been depleted. AfriNIC (Africa) and LACNIC (Latin America and the Caribbean) use relatively few addresses per year, so they'll be able to draw from their own pools for some years to come. Although APNIC in the Asia-Pacific region burns through addresses the fastest, the RIRs keep their own pools at a size that is sufficient for nine to 18 months of operation. So any of the three large RIRs could be the first to run out. And within two years, all three will. But this could happen a lot faster if there is a "run on the bank" as ISPs and other address users put in their final requests post haste.

In the meantime, the RIRs are sending their people to the far reaches of the planet to spread the gospel of IPv6. With Facebook following Google/YouTube as a top Web property starting to roll out IPv6 support and Apple adding IPv6 to iOS 4, IPv6 is definitely gaining momentum. While being IPv6-ready isn't going to make anyone immune to the problems that will certainly arise when we run out of IPv4 address space, it's a fair bet that those with IPv6 will have an easier ride than those without.

More on this next week when we report from the IETF meeting in Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Mobile subscriptions hit 5 billion, 70% of global population

The number of mobile phone service subscriptions is continuing to grow at a rate of 2 million every day, and has just eclipsed a mind-blowing 5 billion.

Those numbers are according to industry estimates discussed in a press release sent out today by Ericsson.
The company also notes that there are now more than 500 million active 3G data subscriptions. The area where growth is significantly climbing is in emerging markets like China and India.

10 years ago, only 720 million people in the world had mobile phone service. Today, there are more than that in China alone.

Ericsson says we are far from hitting a plateau, and expects the number of mobile broadband subscriptions to reach 3.4 billion by 2015, and total number of connected mobile devices around the world to climb to 50 billion by 2020.

In markets where there is already a substantial penetration of mobile connections, the number of connected devices per person is also expected to grow, with gadgets like the iPad and e-readers now coming equipped with mobile service.

ICANN Approves Chinese Internationalized Domain Names

Board Also Moves Forward on .XXX Domain Application

Brussels, Belgium… 25 June 2010… Millions of Chinese language users will soon be able to access the Internet using Chinese script following a decision today by ICANN’s Board of Directors to approve a set of Chinese language internationalized domain names.


“This approval is a significant change for Chinese language users worldwide,” said Rod Beckstrom, President and Chief Executive Officer of ICANN. “One fifth of the world speaks Chinese and that means we just increased the potential online accessibility for roughly a billion people.”
The new IDN country code top-level domains (ccTLDs) and the associated organizations approved by the Board are:
• CNNIC (China Internet Network Information Center)
• HKIRC (Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited)
• TWNIC (Taiwan Network Information Center).
The ICANN board also voted to allow the application for the controversial .XXX top-level domain (TLD) to move forward. The ICM registry applied for the .XXX sponsored top-level domain as a potential community site for the adult entertainment industry. The Board approved a detailed set of next steps for the application, including expedited due diligence, negotiations on a draft registry agreement, and consultation with ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee.
The decision in effect agreed with a non-binding majority decision of the Independent Review Panel. In February two of the three members of the IRP said the board should reconsider its 2007 decision to reject ICM’s sTLD application.
ICANN Chairman Peter Dengate Thrush said, “The board reached a carefully considered decision, paying close attention to the findings of the Independent Review Panel, and to the extensive public comment on our proposed action."
“Today’s decision is a validation of ICANN’s transparency and accountability,” said Rod Beckstrom, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Envisioning an internet that's 100 times faster
Computer Science researchers at MIT have demonstrated a new way of organizing optical networks which could (in most cases) eliminate the need for conversion of the optical signals into electrical ones -- the way that the internet currently functions. Eliminating this extremely inefficient conversion could lead to an internet that is 100 times faster. The new approach, which lead researcher Vincent Chan calls "flow switching," establishes a dedicated path across the network from one point to the other, always in the same direction, eliminating the need for the router to store any data in memory while another conversion completes, and speeding up the whole process considerably. So what's holding us back from getting this super speedy internet in our clutches? Chan says there's no proven demand for internet that's that fast, so there's no real money behind the project. Considering that we'd pay almost any amount of money for such a thing, we find it hard to believe, but come on world: let's do this.
New DSL speed record: 300Mbps—but you won't get it soon

Last mile copper loops are largely considered a dead-end technology; fiber-to-the-home and coaxial cable systems offer much more headroom, so much so that even the recent National Broadband Plan lamented that most Americans would soon have only zero or one options for truly high-speed broadband. DSL users would remain stuck in the slow lane.

But DSL is not quite dead, and new research out of Bell Labs has resulted in a new speed record: 300Mbps.

So is DSL's future so bright that it needs to wear shades? We wouldn't invest in the shades just yet. This 300Mbps demo requires the DSL user to be within 400 meters of the local node; when the distance is extended to 1km, top speeds decline to 100Mbps. For those further away from the access point, as many in America are—my own home is twice that distance—these top speeds will be substantially lower.

Still, it's far better than the 6Mbps top speed AT&T offers me now (some AT&T U-verse customers can now get up to 24Mbps), but the new technology has other issues. Foremost among them: it requires the bonding of two DSL lines to each home.

This sort of "channel bonding" has long been used in DOCSIS cable systems and has been tested in the lab on DSL, but it never quite seems to make it to market in a big way.

To hit these high speeds, Bell Labs used channel bonding, vectoring (technology that avoids crosstalk interference between wires), and an analog "phantom mode." Phantom mode "involves the creation of a virtual or 'Phantom' channel that supplements the two physical wires that are the standard configuration for copper transmission lines," according to the lab.

Combine all these technologies together, use a pair of DSL lines, and test in the lab, and you get 300Mbps. The technology may be attractive to telcos who prefer to milk the value of their copper networks without springing for a more substantial fiber-optic upgrade.

Gee Rittenhouse, head of Research at Bell Labs, made this point, saying, "What makes DSL Phantom Mode such an important breakthrough is that it combines cutting edge technology with an attractive business model that will open up entirely new commercial opportunities for service providers, enabling them in particular, to offer the latest broadband IP-based services using existing network infrastructure."

1 - 10 Next

 ‭(Hidden)‬ Admin Links

 
     
  Copyright © 2000-2009 IBIL (M) Sdn Bhd [245453-K]. All rights reserved